Woah, look at how many active topics we have! Alright, this has been bugging me for a while. A long while. I know you're doing your job, but I'm pretty sure there's a more effective way to deal with things.
I'll quote few of Nymunne's bumps and comment on them. Please don't take it personal, Nymunne. It's basically a message to the whole team.
You can mark them without really bumping the topic and informing us. If bumping things help you "organize" the forum and make it easier for you to know which topics you dealt, I think the Accepted/Rejected/Resolved/Idkwhat section is already doing the job. If there's another reason for bumping these, please let us know.Nymunne wrote:Marking this as resolved.
A month old. In most cases, if there was still a problem, the guy would let you know earlier.
Again, you don't really need to explain why you're moving the topic from a section to another. Nephyx was technically the last one who posted. Keeping the topic as is and marking/moving it without bumping would've had the same effect for the player as bumping it and highlighting Nephyx again. Additionally, what Nephyx wrote was already a decent closure.
I might be the only one complaining about this, but I'm sure many others who use "View Active Topics" or even "View New Posts" are bothered by this. We don't really have to mark topics as read after each flood. Either don't bump, or deal with the situation slowly instead of 30-40 at once.