When we hit Wotlk, lets skip Nax10-25 (Rejected)

#1 » Post by **Dreadnought101** » 07 Oct 2017 07:20

Primal wow has the unique advantage of having more then 90% of its population clearing naxx40. Blizzard originally implemented naxx10-25 so that people could experience what only the 0.1% could see, but there is very little difference between 10-25 and 40 naxx in terms of mechanics.

I recommend we skip nax10-25 gear and all, grab our ruby/obsidian raids real quick and head into Ulduar, because lets face it.

Everyone WANTS ulduar, I would rather do Ulduar content for 180 days then 90 days of Ulduar and 90 days of Naxx.

What about gear requirements? Ulduar normal is not that hard, players are simply better then what they were 8 years ago, we can do this, and let normal Ulduar gear us up for heroic instead of naxx.

#2 » Post by **loveable** » 07 Oct 2017 08:42

you need to do naxx for T7 , you cant do ulduar with t6

#3 » Post by **dj33mi** » 07 Oct 2017 09:32

i would raid naxx 10 and 25 for 2 years and wouldnt get bored. Naxx and Ulduar are the raids that bring most memories to ppl cause it was the peak of wow.

#4 » Post by **Gadoschi** » 07 Oct 2017 09:41

When Primal hits Wotlk, how about we just merge the realms and help TW

#5 » Post by **Anesthesia** » 07 Oct 2017 09:53

Dreadnought101 wrote: ↑
07 Oct 2017 07:20
Primal wow has the unique advantage of having more then 90% of its population clearing naxx40.

#6 » Post by **natnat123** » 07 Oct 2017 11:21

i for one would like naxx, used to love it when i was tanking there in wowlk

#7 » Post by **lrctgl** » 07 Oct 2017 11:41

Dreadnought101 wrote: ↑
07 Oct 2017 07:20
Primal wow has the unique advantage of having more then 90% of its population clearing naxx40.

lol where the hell did you get those numbers

as far as i remember only 3 guilds cleared it fully

#8 » Post by **.Watson1988** » 07 Oct 2017 13:21

lrctgl wrote: ↑
07 Oct 2017 11:41

lol where the hell did you get those numbers

70% of the statistics on the internet are made up.

#9 » Post by **Fitzpatrick** » 07 Oct 2017 14:33

Naxx: 60% of the time, it works every time.

Nyeriah · #10 » Post by **Nyeriah** » 07 Oct 2017 14:36

Naxx is more fun than Ulduar to me. Something with Ulduar taking too long to be cleared is upsetting. I think this is entirely a point of view and personal perspective matter, I see no reason for us to skip it. In fact, I'm aware that many people miss the Naxxramas farming days...

#11 » Post by **Eronox** » 07 Oct 2017 19:21

Majority of PW community wishes for Naxxramas. Even to have it doable now during TBC aswell, so community wise I believe this woudn't be liked. I don't like the idea of skipping a part of progression either.

Nevertheless, this so far into the future anyways.

#12 » Post by **loveable** » 08 Oct 2017 08:51

we have problem with t10 to clear ulduar , imagine ulduar with t6 and tbc experiance

big point of naxx is to teach players how wotlk raids are
ofc naxx in vanillla is not like wotlk , it was 40 man , this one is 10 and 25 so ye this one is much harder

#13 » Post by **.Watson1988** » 08 Oct 2017 10:11

"Wotlk Naxx" and "hard" in the same sentence. I can't say if you are serious or trolling.

But factually, most classes and specs will do more healing and dps with 3.3.5 client settings than they did at 3.0. So, we might need some buffs to Naxx 10 and Naxx 25 otherwise it will be a giant snooze fest.

(I saw some naxx boss first kills for Northcraft and dps and healing (probably tank damge taken as well) was utterly ridiculous.)

#14 » Post by **dgreenbe** » 13 Oct 2017 00:05

dj33mi wrote: ↑
07 Oct 2017 09:32
i would raid naxx 10 and 25 for 2 years and wouldnt get bored. Naxx and Ulduar are the raids that bring most memories to ppl cause it was the peak of wow.

naxx is vanilla

#15 » Post by **natnat123** » 18 Dec 2017 18:15

changing this to rejected. naxx 10/25 is a wrath raid and will not be skipped

Existing user Log In