[Accepted] More Ladders (Companions, Mounts, etc)

#1 » Post by **Gnurg** » 07 Apr 2016 17:48

Would it be possible to add two ladders for companion count and mount count similiar to the achievement ladder we already have? I suppose you could reuse a lot from the achievement ladder page, just have it retrieve the mount/companion count instead of achievement points.

It's probably not too important for the average player, by I myself and other collectors might fancy having such a page.

Gnurg wrote:To make it fair:
- exclude mounts/companions from the vote shop
- exclude mounts/companions that are class unique
- exclude mounts/companions that can't be obtain on our server

#2 » Post by **Nemirex** » 07 Apr 2016 23:05

I think it is not important as much as fixing quests , npc's , raids and dungeons .

But it is an interesting suggestion.

#3 » Post by **Gnurg** » 07 Apr 2016 23:32

Both sorttable.js and achladder.js should be compatible and shouldn't have to be altered for this.

All that is required would be to retrieve the top 100 players in a similiar fashion to how the achievement list's players are retrieved and you would have it up and running.

#4 » Post by **Fastor** » 08 Apr 2016 00:09

While idea is nice, it wont be true. Notice that l posses all pets you could obtain ingame and all pets from shop. And if you combine those two and add one more pet which was reward from some TW event, you will see that lm not first on list, but people who donated on other servers and transferred here.

#5 » Post by **Tenebro** » 08 Apr 2016 00:38

would like to see this implemented but ye as fastor said kinda pointless since we have ppl like branhos who got his mounts/companions from omega wow lottery or donated for them and now they are in top of the ladders, this should be implemented once staff removes all the companions that are not obtainable on true wow, ingame or by voting otherless there is just no point in farming your way to the top when there is no chance to reach it

#6 » Post by **Ancestor** » 08 Apr 2016 07:05

again fkin removal...dont remove things
but +1 for ladder

#7 » Post by **VergilGC** » 26 Apr 2016 16:23

Most if not every person who is farming companions and mounts would like this.
+1

#8 » Post by **Dysphoria** » 26 Apr 2016 16:27

I would like to see warlock pets get fixed and then companions and mounts ladder.

#9 » Post by **Liqueur** » 26 Apr 2016 16:35

I support this idea, and there has been suggestions regarding it before, for now we only have that thread where for example personally I have been reporting the new mounts I got. But yeah one that updates itself automatically would be great. Another suggestion to satisfy people would be to simply not add the pets and mounts unobtainable on TW to the list. That way no one has their pets and mounts removed ingame, but people like Fastor can see their true ranks in the list. And why would implementing these lists exclude warlock pets or anything else being fixed? We got transmog for crying out loud.

#10 » Post by **Gnurg** » 26 Apr 2016 16:51

To make it fair:
- exclude mounts/companions from the vote shop
- exclude mounts/companions that are class unique

Seems right?

#11 » Post by **Fastor** » 26 Apr 2016 17:00

Gnurg wrote:To make it fair:
- exclude mounts/companions from the vote shop
- exclude mounts/companions that are class unique

Seems right?

Right. And exclude mounts/companions that are not possible to get on this server.

#12 » Post by **Liqueur** » 26 Apr 2016 17:07

I don't agree to these terms. Then you might as well exclude profession specific mounts too. I think it's everyone's choice what classes and professions they choose, and the extra mounts that come with them. As for the vote shop mounts and companions, it is also everyone's choice to donate or vote for them. Due to being able to vote, no one is in a disadvantage, even if they have no means of donating. From this point of view, everyone has equal chances at obtaining said mounts and companions. It would only be fair to exclude mounts and pets that cannot be obtained in any way on our server.

#13 » Post by **Etro** » 21 Jul 2016 20:32

Accepted for a while now.

Existing user Log In