Why not just ".qc" with no quest linked?Nyeriah wrote:I think that's an overkill. It could be split on a secondary command or something.
Like ".qc all" or whatever.
[Accepted] Enhancing the .qc command vol 2
- assassin10
- Posts: 74
- Joined: 24 Jun 2014 21:09
Re: Enhancing the .qc command vol 2
Re: Enhancing the .qc command vol 2
+1assassin10 wrote:Why not just ".qc" with no quest linked?Nyeriah wrote:I think that's an overkill. It could be split on a secondary command or something.
Like ".qc all" or whatever.
- ItchyVortex
- Posts: 1131
- Joined: 02 Feb 2013 19:22
Re: Enhancing the .qc command vol 2
So that could return a description of the command, .qc all isnt that hard to write :p
Re: Enhancing the .qc command vol 2
Why take when you can give without taking?
Players will still type qc after every quest, so why use the more resource expensive command when it's not needed?
Regardless, such change will not happen anyway.
Players will still type qc after every quest, so why use the more resource expensive command when it's not needed?
Regardless, such change will not happen anyway.
Re: Enhancing the .qc command vol 2
wat?Nyeriah wrote:Regardless, such change will not happen anyway.
Re: Enhancing the .qc command vol 2
Heihachi once created a tool to update it. I remember it was some batch file. It's lost somewhere on the Forum
Elder Myaoming (aka Slardar): Level 80 Tauren Feral PvE/PvP
Siforosse of the Undercity: Level 80 Undead Affliction Warlock PvP/Demon PvE
Zibuluge of the Ashen Verdict: Level 80 Human Frost DK PvP/PvE
Inverse: Level 80 Human Fire Mage PvP/PvE
Slar: Level 80 Night Elf Resto/Feral Druid PvE
Siforosse of the Undercity: Level 80 Undead Affliction Warlock PvP/Demon PvE
Zibuluge of the Ashen Verdict: Level 80 Human Frost DK PvP/PvE
Inverse: Level 80 Human Fire Mage PvP/PvE
Slar: Level 80 Night Elf Resto/Feral Druid PvE
Re: Enhancing the .qc command vol 2
To update what?Myaoming wrote:Heihachi once created a tool to update it. I remember it was some batch file. It's lost somewhere on the Forum
I was refering toWilcox wrote:wat?Nyeriah wrote:Regardless, such change will not happen anyway.
Fastor wrote:+1assassin10 wrote:Why not just ".qc" with no quest linked?Nyeriah wrote:I think that's an overkill. It could be split on a secondary command or something.
Like ".qc all" or whatever.
Re: Enhancing the .qc command vol 2
K, now let's implement it! i have faith in you nyeriah
Re: Enhancing the .qc command vol 2
It's already live, closing this suggestion now. For anything else, use the thread I posted at PTR & Bugs discussions
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests