Isle of Conquest

All you need to know about the happenings of TrueWoW can be found here.
User avatar
Fastor
Posts: 4031
Joined: 16 Dec 2012 17:38

Re: Isle of Conquest

#16 » Post by Fastor » 25 Feb 2015 18:18

Nyeriah wrote:Prodigy ain't the only one that knows how to read a crash log. As a matter of fact I already fixed the crash.
Miracle ! :D

User avatar
ShinDarth
Donor
Posts: 113
Joined: 02 Jul 2013 07:51
Location: Italy
Contact:

Re: Isle of Conquest

#17 » Post by ShinDarth » 26 Feb 2015 10:45

Keep up the good work!

Horde won the first IoC, GZ! ^_^
Former GamingConsortium developer

Creator of PvPstats

Former 70-79 Twink player - M/Nadrine (Destruction Warlock)

User avatar
Fastor
Posts: 4031
Joined: 16 Dec 2012 17:38

Re: Isle of Conquest

#18 » Post by Fastor » 26 Feb 2015 10:48

You just listed people l hate now since they made it during my raids. :evil:
3 of them on that list purposly died on breath so they would lose combat and enter bg.

User avatar
Roel
Founder
Posts: 6485
Joined: 17 May 2010 14:51
Location: Planet Earth

Re: Isle of Conquest

#19 » Post by Roel » 26 Feb 2015 10:49

So they managed to get it going through the IoC queue?

User avatar
Fastor
Posts: 4031
Joined: 16 Dec 2012 17:38

Re: Isle of Conquest

#20 » Post by Fastor » 26 Feb 2015 10:51

Direct IoC queue. Yes.

RBG is still bad, l would like to bump my idea.
Fastor wrote: but lets for one week, this week make IoC same level as AB instead AV.

Just this week.

User avatar
Justicelight
Donor
Posts: 1130
Joined: 05 Dec 2011 21:47
Location: Romania

Re: Isle of Conquest

#21 » Post by Justicelight » 02 Mar 2015 04:05

Direct queue is a good idea but having IoC in RBG queue increases the numbers of ally queueing RBG while hoping one bg after another to start IoC, thing made ofcourse of horde side too. I see IoC as a factor which can increase the number of players who queue for pvp, factor which performs better with IoC as a part of RBG queue rather than direct queue.
Image
"I write about the power of trying, because I want to be okay with failing. I write about generosity because I battle selfishness. I write about joy because I know sorrow. I write about faith because I almost lost mine, and I know what it is to be broken and in need of redemption. I write about gratitude because I am thankful - for all of it."

User avatar
Nyeriah

Re: Isle of Conquest

#22 » Post by Nyeriah » 02 Mar 2015 05:05

We did not (nor are planning to) remove IoC from the RBG list, Justicelight.

User avatar
marko1984
Posts: 1168
Joined: 11 Nov 2012 15:18
Location: Srb!

Re: Isle of Conquest

#23 » Post by marko1984 » 02 Mar 2015 09:26

what is the number of ppl in que required for AV / IOC atm?
Three mages!

User avatar
Fastor
Posts: 4031
Joined: 16 Dec 2012 17:38

Re: Isle of Conquest

#24 » Post by Fastor » 02 Mar 2015 09:30

10 10

User avatar
marko1984
Posts: 1168
Joined: 11 Nov 2012 15:18
Location: Srb!

Re: Isle of Conquest

#25 » Post by marko1984 » 02 Mar 2015 09:46

whats the problem then? O.o
Three mages!

User avatar
Fastor
Posts: 4031
Joined: 16 Dec 2012 17:38

Re: Isle of Conquest

#26 » Post by Fastor » 02 Mar 2015 09:48

3hour cd that was introduced to avoid 5v5 AV. Notice that IoC and AV are same level so they share same cd.

User avatar
marko1984
Posts: 1168
Joined: 11 Nov 2012 15:18
Location: Srb!

Re: Isle of Conquest

#27 » Post by marko1984 » 02 Mar 2015 10:04

meh then..
Three mages!

User avatar
Roel
Founder
Posts: 6485
Joined: 17 May 2010 14:51
Location: Planet Earth

Re: Isle of Conquest

#28 » Post by Roel » 02 Mar 2015 10:11

Well the cd is mainly to motivate people to queue when AV pops up as most players don't want to play more than one AV each day. I expect in the long run the same to apply for IoC but maybe the cd can be reduced because we have more variety with these 2 BGs now.

Also, releasing new content like IoC and Ruby Sanctum is mostly meant to keep players interested for longer. Like Justicelight explains, we want players to queue RBG to keep our PvP activity up.
marko1984 wrote:what is the number of ppl in que required for AV / IOC atm?
Through RBG we actually need a full 15v15 AB, EotS or SotA before AV or IoC will start. But not all of them will queue again, AV and IoC will close when it's less than 10v10.

User avatar
marko1984
Posts: 1168
Joined: 11 Nov 2012 15:18
Location: Srb!

Re: Isle of Conquest

#29 » Post by marko1984 » 02 Mar 2015 10:22

Roel wrote:Well the cd is mainly to motivate people to queue when AV pops up as most players don't want to play more than one AV each day. I expect in the long run the same to apply for IoC but maybe the cd can be reduced because we have more variety with these 2 BGs now.

Also, releasing new content like IoC and Ruby Sanctum is mostly meant to keep players interested for longer. Like Justicelight explains, we want players to queue RBG to keep our PvP activity up.
marko1984 wrote:what is the number of ppl in que required for AV / IOC atm?
Through RBG we actually need a full 15v15 AB, EotS or SotA before AV or IoC will start. But not all of them will queue again, AV and IoC will close when it's less than 10v10.
problem is that when 15v15 bg is active we get 3v3 more and WSG pops and screws our chance for IOC/AV :s
Three mages!

User avatar
Roel
Founder
Posts: 6485
Joined: 17 May 2010 14:51
Location: Planet Earth

Re: Isle of Conquest

#30 » Post by Roel » 02 Mar 2015 10:27

marko1984 wrote:problem is that when 15v15 bg is active we get 3v3 more and WSG pops and screws our chance for IOC/AV :s
If that's the case I will need to tweak the script a little. Though it could also have been because the CD was active.

Locked

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests