Prot pally single target threat

Post Reply
User avatar
Fitzpatrick
Honorary Member
Posts: 470
Joined: 21 Jan 2016 19:34

Re: Prot pally single target threat

#91 » Post by Fitzpatrick » 03 Oct 2017 14:14

Sorry, Seal of Wisdom. You would be using BoSanc obviously.

I dont know what to tell you but I have 0 mana issues in 5-mans and Kara, and I usually run SoC or SoV. I used to, when I had starter gear (didnt avoid much and had to fight hard for threat) especially against caster mobs or if there was a disc priest. Thats why I say it will get better with gear. Perhaps you could link to your character and someone could see if there are issues.
Fitzsimmons / Bibimbap / Fitzpatrick
Image

User avatar
Scen
Posts: 39
Joined: 21 Sep 2017 20:12

Re: Prot pally single target threat

#92 » Post by Scen » 03 Oct 2017 14:34

If I use seal of wisdom then I'm losing my main (non aoe) damage source. Having to use Seal of wisdom and Judgement of wisdom is way too much just to keep up on mana. Getting mana back when I'm tanking 5+ mobs is easy but when I'm against one then I go oom fairly quick. Theres nothing you can suggest to fix it unless you suggest taking int and mana per 5... which a lot of the paladin tanking gear set has even though i still need to prioritise strength/spellpower. WOTLK prot paladin is clearly based around divine plea and struggles without it.

User avatar
Fitzpatrick
Honorary Member
Posts: 470
Joined: 21 Jan 2016 19:34

Re: Prot pally single target threat

#93 » Post by Fitzpatrick » 03 Oct 2017 14:57

I dont have mana issues nor Divine Plea, so clearly thats false. I also dont use any mp5 gear.
Fitzsimmons / Bibimbap / Fitzpatrick
Image

User avatar
Dunkelstein
Posts: 324
Joined: 11 Oct 2015 22:32

Re: Prot pally single target threat

#94 » Post by Dunkelstein » 03 Oct 2017 14:58

Scen wrote:
03 Oct 2017 14:34
WOTLK prot paladin is clearly based around divine plea and struggles without it.
As far as I'm aware, the only mana regeneration prot paladins had in true TBC, that they don't have on Primal, are mana pots being available multiple times per fight. Not 100% sure, though.

As for problems with not being hit as OT.... it's sad but that's just how paladins always worked. Imo their other quirks more than make up for it, though.
Aka Funkelstein

User avatar
Scen
Posts: 39
Joined: 21 Sep 2017 20:12

Re: Prot pally single target threat

#95 » Post by Scen » 03 Oct 2017 15:05

Fitzpatrick wrote:
03 Oct 2017 14:57
I dont have mana issues nor Divine Plea, so clearly thats false. I also dont use any mp5 gear.
Because you use judgement of wisedom and seal of wisdom together. Sacrifcing your strongest single target dps spell.
Dunkelstein wrote:
03 Oct 2017 14:58
As far as I'm aware, the only mana regeneration prot paladins had in true TBC, that they don't have on Primal, are mana pots being available multiple times per fight. Not 100% sure, though.
This isn't TBC patch though. Their spell costs and cooldowns were different.

User avatar
Fitzpatrick
Honorary Member
Posts: 470
Joined: 21 Jan 2016 19:34

Re: Prot pally single target threat

#96 » Post by Fitzpatrick » 03 Oct 2017 15:30

Youre not listening, Scen. I said if your gear is weak and you have mana issues you could use seal of Wisdom (4% mana return most white hits). Ive also said I use SoC and SoV personally. I cant remember off the top of my head, but I think my Block/Dodge/Parry is near 100% with HS up so BoSanc and 1/2 in the mana-from-heals is more than enough mana to hold threat for me.
Fitzsimmons / Bibimbap / Fitzpatrick
Image

User avatar
jetteroo
Posts: 88
Joined: 18 Feb 2017 05:57

Re: Prot pally single target threat

#97 » Post by jetteroo » 03 Oct 2017 18:15

Scen - i suggest u do not use any of the paladin TBC set gear. With WOTLK mechanics, sp on gear is useless. Focus on Str/+hit gear for threat (i.e. like a warrior) becos touched by light gives u sp from str. Make sure your avoidance is above 102.4% (search internet for that macro that tells u what it is with HS on).

if you are fighting only 1 mob, u dun need to cast anything other JOW and make sure SOV reaches 5 stacks on that mob, while keeping holy shield up.

When fighting multiple mobs, use SOV as well - change targets often to keep as much as possible, keep as many stacks on as many mobs as possible. Look for some hit items that will help u miss less so that u can get back more mana from JOW and also increase SOV stacks on mobs.

If you lose aggro on the mob, use RD and that single target taunt instead of using AS. AS isnt meant to be used unless you have to i.e u lost aggro on an untauntable boss.

User avatar
Almsivi
Former Staff
Posts: 110
Joined: 20 Aug 2017 18:49

Re: Prot pally single target threat

#98 » Post by Almsivi » 03 Oct 2017 18:48

It's getting quite offtopic. Either you stop or I'll need to move topic to guide section :(
There is nothing more difficult to take in hand, more perilous to conduct, or more uncertain in its success, than to take the lead in the introduction of a new order of things.
~Niccolo Machiavelli

User avatar
Fitzpatrick
Honorary Member
Posts: 470
Joined: 21 Jan 2016 19:34

Re: Prot pally single target threat

#99 » Post by Fitzpatrick » 03 Oct 2017 19:18

Ya guys. Stop talking about Prot Paladins in this Prot Paladin thread.
Fitzsimmons / Bibimbap / Fitzpatrick
Image

User avatar
natnat123
Former Staff
Posts: 806
Joined: 14 May 2017 12:24

Re: Prot pally single target threat

#100 » Post by natnat123 » 03 Oct 2017 19:18

Guys, even if paladin single target threat is fine. all it needs is to be a little closer to warrior and druid single target threat. THATS IT, none of all the extra shit everyone has been talking about. all we need to do is find a way to make them a little closer to the other tank classes, to make it more fair. all the extra shit thats being talked about is just an endless debate of shit and irrelevant information.

User avatar
natnat123
Former Staff
Posts: 806
Joined: 14 May 2017 12:24

Re: Prot pally single target threat

#101 » Post by natnat123 » 03 Oct 2017 19:22

And if you want threat data from Anyone. I would say the Best person to ask for that would be Holyzone in murmur. probably the best geared prot pally on the server

User avatar
Scen
Posts: 39
Joined: 21 Sep 2017 20:12

Re: Prot pally single target threat

#102 » Post by Scen » 04 Oct 2017 08:58

People saying it's off topic or irrelevant seem confused. This thread was started to try to get buff's to prot pally single target threat generation. Mana and abilties directly relate to that. It would be nice if some raiding prot tanks would join in the conversation but how many are there currently?

@ Jetteroo
I don't have much of a problem with AoE (unless they're multiple spellcasters with no where to LoS) and auto attacking different targets means you don't get the benfit from Judgement. Saying that the only thing I should use against single target is auto attack and use judgement sounds like awful gameplay.

@ Jetteroo and Dunkelstein
Do you think really Prot Palladins don't need any kind of buff/change then?

User avatar
Dunkelstein
Posts: 324
Joined: 11 Oct 2015 22:32

Re: Prot pally single target threat

#103 » Post by Dunkelstein » 04 Oct 2017 11:54

Scen wrote:
04 Oct 2017 08:58
@Dunkelstein
Do you think really Prot Palladins don't need any kind of buff/change then?
No. As I've said, I am not an expert. Just trying to point out what I do know and raise different questions. I would have to play a prot paladin myself or see someone who I already know the playstily of to be able to vote +1/-1.

What I take away as a bystander is this:
Prot Paladin's kit (in terms of spells and effects) is fine. The way spells work (Holy Shield, Avenger's Shield etc.) is fine, cooldowns or stacks of Holy Shield and so on should not be changed.

The problem with single target threat seems to be either not being able to generate enough threat or spending too much mana to do so.
Anesthesia wrote:
17 Aug 2017 10:17
[...]mana cost of Avenger's Shield and Consecration was reduced mainly so players dont fear to spam them while tanking 1 target and attempting to build aggro as an off tank, hopefully this will help out.

Same goes for RF, if it is needed it could be increased again, its seems that is the safest way to buff paladin threat.
This was already established, it's just a matter of tuning it.

This post is going in circles and quite offtopic. How do you expect anyone to form a clear opinion on this heap and get anywhere?
If anyone actually has a clear-cut idea then I'd say abandon this thread and make another suggestion post where people can share their opinion rather than brainstorm.
And keep using this thread or a new post in the Paladin class forum for brainstorming.
Aka Funkelstein

User avatar
jetteroo
Posts: 88
Joined: 18 Feb 2017 05:57

Re: Prot pally single target threat

#104 » Post by jetteroo » 04 Oct 2017 16:24

@Dunkel and all

I already analysed the situation and laid out the issues

viewtopic.php?f=23&t=37958&start=60

And proposed possible solutions that would have the least impact at unbalancing other specs within the paladin class.

Unfortunately this involves tweaking talents which developers feedback is too tricky to do at this point. The easier way is to buff spells unique to that specific spec but unfortunately there isn't any except maybe holy and avengers shield. Which doesn't really just affect single target threat but affects aoe threat.

Buffing RF is "safe" but wud make aoe tanking too op(?), And honestly isn't the most efficient for the entire raid to work.

The current PTR tweak was to buff sov dot threat which while possible doesn't help make the raid more efficient I.e the raid has to be less efficient per se to accommodate the prot paladin. (I.e. a prot warrior and ret paladin is stronger for raid DPS Vs a prot paladin and arms warrior)

That's my analysis of the entire situation.

#Scen maybe you can send me a private message let discuss this offline

User avatar
Fitzpatrick
Honorary Member
Posts: 470
Joined: 21 Jan 2016 19:34

Re: Prot pally single target threat

#105 » Post by Fitzpatrick » 04 Oct 2017 17:08

Adding threat to SoV would effect rets. Seems pretty poorly thought out.
Fitzsimmons / Bibimbap / Fitzpatrick
Image

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests