Re: The new PVP realm of truewow ( insta 80 )
Posted: 07 Oct 2011 06:00
there were 130 online PLAYERS earlier, not 80s...
The oldest and most dedicated WoW server Community since 2010.
https://truewow.org/forum/
It was 130 80s...I know this because I done /who 80narcissa wrote:there were 130 online PLAYERS earlier, not 80s...
Finally some good news, getting so tired of only icc already o.oRoel wrote:Expecting incoming complaints about fixing classic/TBC raids and Ulduar instead of ICC ^^
(1) Those bugs can be fixed by the admin/devs, many servers get the TC stuff and then fix some (especially minor bugs that can ruin larger parts of the game, like the dreamwalker chest, or class bugs)Alexandros wrote:
-The new realm bugs nothing to the truewow realm, core updates does
-Core fixes are done by the trinity community, Roel only updates them in here.
- Ergo Roel has no fault at all about old and new bugs.
There are a million funserver/instant80 realms already, and with less bugs or good active pvp community that this new realm lacks because, as you have already said:Alexandros wrote:- The new realm is meant for people interested in those kind of playing
this means that it won't attract much people, making (2) more important because tending the main realm nets more reward to the community than tending the sad new realm. Also, if the main realm gets stagnant or more bugged, people can go to the instant 80 realm out of curiosity making the main realm even more stagnant.Alexandros wrote: - TrueWoW since the beggining was only a blizzlike realm.
- So until the new realm came in, people in here was interested only in blizzlike content.
So give up already and end this kind of topics.Locus wrote:
Anyways narcissa, it doesn't matter that it makes sense, they will continue to be blind to it and act as if it's random childish trolling, while regarding criticism as such is a childish attitude on itself.
Awww why are we being pushed to silence?Alexandros wrote:So give up already and end this kind of topics.Locus wrote:
Anyways narcissa, it doesn't matter that it makes sense, they will continue to be blind to it and act as if it's random childish trolling, while regarding criticism as such is a childish attitude on itself.
How can that be when at the same time site said 130 players online and in /who 80 in alliance there were 6-10 max 80s? I must be out of my mind I guess.Flexall wrote:It was 130 80s...I know this because I done /who 80narcissa wrote:there were 130 online PLAYERS earlier, not 80s...
Sadly it can't be proven who of you two is right, but seeing how things are lately I am inclined to think narcissa. Anyway I don't care much about discussion of how the server is doing now (i think it's quite clear and what's important is the future), though what is a tad annoying is that people present reasons for why the instant 80 realm sucks, reasons that make sense and are fully explained, and yet they are handwaved away as pointless trolling.narcissa wrote:How can that be when at the same time site said 130 players online and in /who 80 in alliance there were 6-10 max 80s? I must be out of my mind I guess.Flexall wrote:It was 130 80s...I know this because I done /who 80narcissa wrote:there were 130 online PLAYERS earlier, not 80s...
130 80s online?!? I doubt that very much. Havnt seen those number......ever on truewow.narcissa wrote:How can that be when at the same time site said 130 players online and in /who 80 in alliance there were 6-10 max 80s? I must be out of my mind I guess.Flexall wrote:It was 130 80s...I know this because I done /who 80narcissa wrote:there were 130 online PLAYERS earlier, not 80s...
I've seen more than 70 80's online horde side, so I'm believe we have reached 130 80's onlineCover25 wrote:
130 80s online?!? I doubt that very much. Havnt seen those number......ever on truewow.