Page 12 of 15

Re: The new PVP realm of truewow ( insta 80 )

Posted: 07 Oct 2011 06:00
by narcissa
there were 130 online PLAYERS earlier, not 80s...

Re: The new PVP realm of truewow ( insta 80 )

Posted: 07 Oct 2011 06:45
by Bleed
Image

Roel wanted to say this...

Re: The new PVP realm of truewow ( insta 80 )

Posted: 07 Oct 2011 06:52
by Flexall
narcissa wrote:there were 130 online PLAYERS earlier, not 80s...
It was 130 80s...I know this because I done /who 80

Re: The new PVP realm of truewow ( insta 80 )

Posted: 07 Oct 2011 06:59
by Guided
Roel wrote:Expecting incoming complaints about fixing classic/TBC raids and Ulduar instead of ICC ^^
Finally some good news, getting so tired of only icc already o.o

Re: The new PVP realm of truewow ( insta 80 )

Posted: 07 Oct 2011 07:04
by Locus
Heh.
Alexandros wrote:
-The new realm bugs nothing to the truewow realm, core updates does
-Core fixes are done by the trinity community, Roel only updates them in here.
- Ergo Roel has no fault at all about old and new bugs.
(1) Those bugs can be fixed by the admin/devs, many servers get the TC stuff and then fix some (especially minor bugs that can ruin larger parts of the game, like the dreamwalker chest, or class bugs)
---
(2) Roel gets busy on the new realm when he could be doing (1)
---
(3)
Alexandros wrote:- The new realm is meant for people interested in those kind of playing
There are a million funserver/instant80 realms already, and with less bugs or good active pvp community that this new realm lacks because, as you have already said:
Alexandros wrote: - TrueWoW since the beggining was only a blizzlike realm.
- So until the new realm came in, people in here was interested only in blizzlike content.
this means that it won't attract much people, making (2) more important because tending the main realm nets more reward to the community than tending the sad new realm. Also, if the main realm gets stagnant or more bugged, people can go to the instant 80 realm out of curiosity making the main realm even more stagnant.

---

Anyways narcissa, it doesn't matter that it makes sense, they will continue to be blind to it and act as if it's random childish trolling, while regarding criticism as such is a childish attitude on itself.

Re: The new PVP realm of truewow ( insta 80 )

Posted: 07 Oct 2011 08:42
by Alexandros
Locus wrote:
Anyways narcissa, it doesn't matter that it makes sense, they will continue to be blind to it and act as if it's random childish trolling, while regarding criticism as such is a childish attitude on itself.
So give up already and end this kind of topics.

Re: The new PVP realm of truewow ( insta 80 )

Posted: 07 Oct 2011 08:43
by Roel
1. I fixed the dreamwalker chest, on the standard TC build it's still bugged...

Re: The new PVP realm of truewow ( insta 80 )

Posted: 07 Oct 2011 09:58
by Locus
Alexandros wrote:
Locus wrote:
Anyways narcissa, it doesn't matter that it makes sense, they will continue to be blind to it and act as if it's random childish trolling, while regarding criticism as such is a childish attitude on itself.
So give up already and end this kind of topics.
Awww why are we being pushed to silence?

Also, nice to hear that Roel, hope it sparks PvE again and more people come to the server.

Re: The new PVP realm of truewow ( insta 80 )

Posted: 07 Oct 2011 11:06
by narcissa
Flexall wrote:
narcissa wrote:there were 130 online PLAYERS earlier, not 80s...
It was 130 80s...I know this because I done /who 80
How can that be when at the same time site said 130 players online and in /who 80 in alliance there were 6-10 max 80s? I must be out of my mind I guess.

Re: The new PVP realm of truewow ( insta 80 )

Posted: 07 Oct 2011 11:15
by Locus
narcissa wrote:
Flexall wrote:
narcissa wrote:there were 130 online PLAYERS earlier, not 80s...
It was 130 80s...I know this because I done /who 80
How can that be when at the same time site said 130 players online and in /who 80 in alliance there were 6-10 max 80s? I must be out of my mind I guess.
Sadly it can't be proven who of you two is right, but seeing how things are lately I am inclined to think narcissa. Anyway I don't care much about discussion of how the server is doing now (i think it's quite clear and what's important is the future), though what is a tad annoying is that people present reasons for why the instant 80 realm sucks, reasons that make sense and are fully explained, and yet they are handwaved away as pointless trolling.

Re: The new PVP realm of truewow ( insta 80 )

Posted: 07 Oct 2011 12:18
by Cover25
narcissa wrote:
Flexall wrote:
narcissa wrote:there were 130 online PLAYERS earlier, not 80s...
It was 130 80s...I know this because I done /who 80
How can that be when at the same time site said 130 players online and in /who 80 in alliance there were 6-10 max 80s? I must be out of my mind I guess.
130 80s online?!? I doubt that very much. Havnt seen those number......ever on truewow.

Re: The new PVP realm of truewow ( insta 80 )

Posted: 07 Oct 2011 13:06
by Flexall
You have some weird playing times then, anyways I'll get some SS today of how many are online

Edit: There's 68 online now and it's not peak time yet :P
http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/37 ... 61001.jpg/

Re: The new PVP realm of truewow ( insta 80 )

Posted: 07 Oct 2011 13:14
by Prite
Cover25 wrote:
130 80s online?!? I doubt that very much. Havnt seen those number......ever on truewow.
I've seen more than 70 80's online horde side, so I'm believe we have reached 130 80's online

Re: The new PVP realm of truewow ( insta 80 )

Posted: 07 Oct 2011 19:14
by Flexall

Re: The new PVP realm of truewow ( insta 80 )

Posted: 07 Oct 2011 19:40
by Tassadar
Sadly after the open of frozenwing hall and Lich King pve I really don't get Roel's intention of opening instnat lv80 server anymore.

More chance to attract people in both pve and pvp by playing in x1 blizzlike server and yet separated the population by making another server.

Oh wow I'm really getting more and more curious - I sincerely thought you made the realm b/c there's no "card" left in our blizzlike server but apparently it's not.